-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 670
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Docs: Mention the "last received item index" paradigm in the network protocol docs #2989
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8f73732
Specifically mention "last received items ID" paradigm in the network…
NewSoupVi ae1929a
Better wording maybe
NewSoupVi 9bb369e
What is this double space thing that's so cursed help
NewSoupVi 38221dc
Update docs/network protocol.md
NewSoupVi 139198c
Update network protocol.md
NewSoupVi File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would suggest
it will receive all previously received items
, instead of collected. It feels more intuitive to me, as collected seems to imply what the player actually did, so locations more than items.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now that I re-read this comment, I see it repeats the word "receive" twice.
Maybe
It will be sent all previously received items [...] in a ReceivedItems packet
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, so, the reason I went for "collected" instead of "received" here is that "received" might imply "received by the client", which is not true, it will just send everything that was found for that slot, which could include both "previously processed in the last play session" and "found while offline after the last play session" in one packet. Heck, start inventory as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe
found
? I'm not sureThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since it's literally called a "ReceivedItems" packet, I personally still favor that word. In my mind, someone will have to understand what a received item is sooner or later anyway, so might as well rip the bandaid here.