Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ingest FiberProbe for fiber implant procedures #279

Closed
2 of 3 tasks
saskiad opened this issue Oct 16, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #293
Closed
2 of 3 tasks

Ingest FiberProbe for fiber implant procedures #279

saskiad opened this issue Oct 16, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #293
Assignees

Comments

@saskiad
Copy link
Contributor

saskiad commented Oct 16, 2024

  • Minimum need a name for the probe. Auto generate these based on A/P coordinates. Eg. "Fiber 0", "Fiber 1" from A to P (If NSB adds a name field to the request form, use this, if not use A/P order)
  • NSB appears to have a "Standard" probe option. This must have values for the FiberProbe fields. Let's map these into the FiberProbe
  • Find our from NSB if there are other probe options and if so what their values are.
@dyf
Copy link
Member

dyf commented Oct 30, 2024

image

@mekhlakapoor
Copy link
Contributor

Each burr hole (1-6) has 3 fields related to fiber probes: Fiber Type, Fiber Implant Length, and Fiber Implant D/V in addition to the regular burr hold fields (ML, AP, and 3 D/V fields). Right now the options for Fiber Type are Standard and Custom. There is no input field for the necessary data for Custom.

@mekhlakapoor
Copy link
Contributor

mekhlakapoor commented Oct 30, 2024

These are the specs for the Standard implant type:

Black ceramic ferrule for increased efficiency
and reduced autofluorescence.
1.25 mm ferrule diameter
200 um fiber core diameter.
NA= 0.39

Custom specs are stored in comments. The only 2 custom ones are from Aug 2023, and don't hold much info so I think for now it might make sense to map to None instead of parsing out of comments? @saskiad what d you think?

@saskiad
Copy link
Contributor Author

saskiad commented Oct 30, 2024

Double check the NA. I think Kenta said 0.37. (But I do trust Ali a bit more)

Custom specs coming in the comments is fine - what I gleaned from the email chain was that so far the custom fibers have differed in length but not the other specs, so what I worry about is how to know which specs to alter and which to keep standard.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants