Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Batch processing - Include workflow file in log file #100

Open
schoinh opened this issue Jun 14, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Batch processing - Include workflow file in log file #100

schoinh opened this issue Jun 14, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
engine This issue needs to be addressed in the plugin engine (backend) enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@schoinh
Copy link
Contributor

schoinh commented Jun 14, 2021

Use Case

I think it would be useful for the plugin user to have a record of which workflow was used to generate the files in the output directory.

Solution

Include the name (and path?) of the workflow json file used for the batch processing at the top of the log file. For example:

Batch processing run with workflow /Users/nahyung.choi/Documents/Test Files/sec61b_workflow.json

SUCCESS: /Users/nahyung.choi/Documents/Test Files/batch_input/test_sample_single.tiff. Output saved at /Users/nahyung.choi/Documents/Test Files/batch_output/test_sample_single.segmentation.tiff
SUCCESS: /Users/nahyung.choi/Documents/Test Files/batch_input/tutorial-mitochondria_1.ome.tif. Output saved at /Users/nahyung.choi/Documents/Test Files/batch_output/tutorial-mitochondria_1.ome.segmentation.tiff
2/2 files were successfully processed.
@schoinh schoinh added enhancement New feature or request needs grooming Needs grooming (not ready to work on) labels Jun 14, 2021
@yrkim98 yrkim98 self-assigned this Sep 8, 2021
@yrkim98 yrkim98 added engine This issue needs to be addressed in the plugin engine (backend) and removed needs grooming Needs grooming (not ready to work on) labels Sep 15, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
engine This issue needs to be addressed in the plugin engine (backend) enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants