[question] Are there any plans to enhance command pouch log?

[faycheng]

Ⅰ. Issue Description

Now, pouch log command is unavailable.

pouch logs c534fd
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x8 pc=0xd7b820]

goroutine 1 [running]:
main.(*LogsCommand).runLogs(0xc42007fc80, 0xc42052e050, 0x1, 0x1, 0x0, 0x0)
	/tmp/pouchbuild/src/github.com/alibaba/pouch/cli/logs.go:71 +0xf0
main.(*LogsCommand).Init.func1(0xc4201e0d80, 0xc42052e050, 0x1, 0x1, 0x0, 0x0)
	/tmp/pouchbuild/src/github.com/alibaba/pouch/cli/logs.go:40 +0x48
github.com/alibaba/pouch/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute(0xc4201e0d80, 0xc42052e020, 0x1, 0x1, 0xc4201e0d80, 0xc42052e020)
	/tmp/pouchbuild/src/github.com/alibaba/pouch/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:742 +0x48e
github.com/alibaba/pouch/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC(0xc4201ef200, 0xd72881, 0xc4201ef200, 0xc42051def0)
	/tmp/pouchbuild/src/github.com/alibaba/pouch/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:827 +0x2e4
github.com/alibaba/pouch/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute(0xc4201ef200, 0xc4201e1680, 0xc4201e1680)
	/tmp/pouchbuild/src/github.com/alibaba/pouch/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:780 +0x2b
main.(*Cli).Run(0xc4201555e0, 0xfb5de0, 0xc42051f620)
	/tmp/pouchbuild/src/github.com/alibaba/pouch/cli/cli.go:78 +0x2f
main.main()
	/tmp/pouchbuild/src/github.com/alibaba/pouch/cli/main.go:49 +0x952

Ⅱ. Describe what happened

Ⅲ. Describe what you expected to happen

Ⅳ. How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)

Ⅴ. Anything else we need to know?

Ⅵ. Environment:

• pouch version (use pouch version):
• OS (e.g. from /etc/os-release):
• Kernel (e.g. uname -a):
• Install tools:
• Others:

[allencloud]

Yes, it is in our plan. However, we have to say in legacy environment lots of applications in container would use an inner logagent or something like that to take over log management. So, we lowered the priority of pouch logs command. But repeat it again, logs command is in pouch's scope.
Do you have any thoughts on this? We are totally encouraging high qualified contributors would help pouch to make it work in pouch logs. @faycheng

[faycheng]

hi, @allencloud , thanks a lot for your answer.
i am be glad to contribute to pouch, and i will try to make it work in the next few days.