Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Paper on GitHub process and RP meeting structure and changes #10

Closed
sarahcleary opened this issue May 27, 2019 · 11 comments
Closed

Paper on GitHub process and RP meeting structure and changes #10

sarahcleary opened this issue May 27, 2019 · 11 comments
Assignees
@Keith-Pembleton @sarahcleary
Labels
Action

Comments

@sarahcleary
Copy link
Contributor

Request for update of GitHub process and RP Meeting structure/changes

ACTION @Keith-Pembleton and @sarahcleary to commence work on paper
@sarahcleary sarahcleary mentioned this issue Jun 5, 2019
Closed
@sarahcleary sarahcleary mentioned this issue Jun 12, 2019
Closed
@sarahcleary
Copy link
Contributor Author

@APSIMInitiative/reference-panel - please send any comments to @Keith-Pembleton

@sarahcleary sarahcleary mentioned this issue Jul 4, 2019
Closed
@sarahcleary
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also note that an action from the AI SC meeting was "RP to involve/notify/incorporate home organisation key personnel into the new GitHub process".

@sarahcleary sarahcleary mentioned this issue Jul 9, 2019
Closed
@sarahcleary
Copy link
Contributor Author

@APSIMInitiative/reference-panel - please forward any comments to @Keith-Pembleton prior to AI SC on Friday.

@sarahcleary
Copy link
Contributor Author

Reopen issue - action from August AI SC Meeting - RP to provide report on GitHub processes at next SC meeting

@sarahcleary sarahcleary reopened this Aug 22, 2019
@sarahcleary sarahcleary mentioned this issue Aug 27, 2019
Closed
@sarahcleary sarahcleary mentioned this issue Sep 9, 2019
Closed
@sarahcleary
Copy link
Contributor Author

Reminder: @APSIMInitiative/reference-panel to provide feedback to @Keith-Pembleton via email, phone etc..

@sno036
Copy link

sno036 commented Sep 30, 2019

@sarahcleary - apologies for denseness. Feedback on what?

@sarahcleary
Copy link
Contributor Author

@APSIMInitiative/reference-panel - AI SC are interested in an update on how the 'new' RP processes/structure are working, in particular, the utilisation of GitHub. Please feed any comments (positive and negative) to @Keith-Pembleton. Sorry @sno036 for missing your message

@sarahcleary sarahcleary mentioned this issue Nov 4, 2019
Closed
@sarahcleary
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ongoing Action.
Propose Verbal update by @peter-devoil and/or @kchenu at next AI SC meeting. Please feed any comments to either @peter-devoil, @kchenu or me.

@sarahcleary sarahcleary mentioned this issue Feb 2, 2020
Closed
@sarahcleary sarahcleary mentioned this issue Feb 10, 2020
Closed
@sarahcleary
Copy link
Contributor Author

agree to be a verbal update. @APSIMInitiative/reference-panel to provide @peter-devoil with comments/input

@EnliWang
Copy link

I feel that current processes/structure are working well. The utilisation of GitHub helped tracking issues and communications in RP

@sarahcleary sarahcleary mentioned this issue Feb 25, 2020
Closed
@sarahcleary sarahcleary mentioned this issue Mar 8, 2020
Closed
@sarahcleary
Copy link
Contributor Author

@APSIMInitiative/reference-panel - please note any issues/suggestions

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Keith-Pembleton Keith-Pembleton

@sarahcleary sarahcleary

Labels
Action
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@sno036 @EnliWang @Keith-Pembleton @sarahcleary