Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README.md #118

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2024
Merged

Update README.md #118

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2024

Conversation

kazhuravlev
Copy link
Contributor

@kazhuravlev kazhuravlev commented Oct 6, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added an "IMPORTANT" section in the README to encourage new maintainers and contributors.
    • Updated installation command to reflect the new Helm chart version 0.25.2.

@kazhuravlev kazhuravlev requested a review from a team as a code owner October 6, 2024 17:25
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes made in the pull request primarily affect the README.md file for the n8n Helm chart. A new "IMPORTANT" section has been added at the beginning, highlighting the need for more maintainers and contributors, along with a call to action. Additionally, the installation command has been updated to reflect a new Helm chart version, changing from 0.25.0 to 0.25.2. The overall structure of the README remains largely intact.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Added "IMPORTANT" section requesting more maintainers and contributors; updated installation command from version 0.25.0 to 0.25.2.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant README
    participant Maintainers

    User->>README: View README.md
    README->>User: Display content
    User->>Maintainers: Express interest in contributing
    Maintainers->>User: Provide guidance
Loading

🐰 "In the README, a call to all,
To join the team and heed the call.
With version new, the chart's in play,
Together we'll enhance the way!
So hop along, let's make it bright,
For n8n's future, let's unite!" 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

Line range hint 1-4: Excellent addition of the "IMPORTANT" section.

The new section effectively highlights the project's need for contributors and maintainers. It's well-placed at the beginning of the README for visibility.

Consider adding a blank line after the blockquote to improve readability:

 > We would like to bring this Helm chart to the next level, in terms of automation, governance and documentation.  This can only be achieved with a diverse community. Hence, we are looking for additional maintainers and contributors to impove this project, code, documentation, automation. [Reach out](https://github.com/8gears/n8n-helm-chart/discussions/90) to us if you are interested in contributing.
+
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ca06af7 and b2a37bf.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
README.md (2)

Line range hint 1-48: Summary of changes to README.md

The changes to this file are minimal and focused:

  1. Addition of an "IMPORTANT" section at the beginning, encouraging community involvement.
  2. Update of the Helm chart version in the installation command.

These changes improve the documentation by highlighting the project's needs and ensuring users install the latest version of the Helm chart. The rest of the comprehensive documentation remains intact, maintaining consistency.


48-48: Helm chart version updated.

The Helm chart version has been updated from 0.25.0 to 0.25.2 in the installation command. This change is consistent with the PR title.

Please confirm that version 0.25.2 is the latest release of the Helm chart. You can verify this by running the following command:

This command will display the latest version of the Helm chart. Ensure that 0.25.2 is indeed the latest version.

@kazhuravlev
Copy link
Contributor Author

magic

@kazhuravlev
Copy link
Contributor Author

ok, looks like this is not working well.

@Vad1mo Vad1mo merged commit ae3ea49 into 8gears:main Oct 9, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants