You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a maintainer
I want to apply a structured approach to assigning issue labels
So that they are consistent over time
As a contributor or project user
I want to know how/why labels are assigned
So that I understand...
issue status and how it's assigned,
issue priority and how it's assigned, and
issue type and how it's assigned
Implementation notes
Priority
Priority will generally start as Low and will be upgraded to Medium, High, or Critical, depending on the severity of the issue
Status
Abandoned: issue closed due to inactivity or item that will not be fixed
Blocked: issue or PR that will not be fixed (include explanation in issue/PR)
In Progress: issue has been assigned and is actively being addressed; label issue On Hold with comments if there will be a significant delay
Maintainer Review Needed: last step prior to merge; PR passes continuous integration tests and are able to be cleanly merged - awaiting review for style, code cleanliness, etc.
On Hold: provide various reasons an issue or PR might be on hold
Pending Contributor Response: closed after 14 days of inactivity (label Abandoned at closure)
Type
Bug: requires clear test case and be reproducible
Differentiate between enhancement, feature request, maintenance (with examples)
Feature requests require well-written, clear user story
Question - self explanatory
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ModbusMaster version
0.11.0
Arduino IDE version
any
Arduino Hardware
any
Platform Details
any
Feature Request
Narrative:
Implementation notes
Priority
Status
Type
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: