Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AntiAura incompatible with VeinMiner #73

Closed
HypixionGaming opened this issue Dec 5, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

AntiAura incompatible with VeinMiner #73

HypixionGaming opened this issue Dec 5, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
bug A bug report good first issue An issue that would be very easy for a new contributor to try to resolve for their first

Comments

@HypixionGaming
Copy link

But i feel this would be better on git

[21:00:50] [Server thread/ERROR]: Error occurred while enabling VeinMiner v1.17.9 (Is it up to date?)
java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke "Object.getClass()" because "this.antiAuraApi" is null
at wtf.choco.veinminer.anticheat.AntiCheatHookAntiAura.(AntiCheatHookAntiAura.java:41) ~[VeinMiner-Bukkit-1.17.9.jar:?]
at wtf.choco.veinminer.VeinMiner.lambda$onEnable$2(VeinMiner.java:126) ~[VeinMiner-Bukkit-1.17.9.jar:?]
at wtf.choco.veinminer.VeinMiner.registerAntiCheatHookIfEnabled(VeinMiner.java:380) ~[VeinMiner-Bukkit-1.17.9.jar:?]
at wtf.choco.veinminer.VeinMiner.onEnable(VeinMiner.java:126) ~[VeinMiner-Bukkit-1.17.9.jar:?]
at org.bukkit.plugin.java.JavaPlugin.setEnabled(JavaPlugin.java:264) ~[purpur-api-1.18-R0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar:?]
at org.bukkit.plugin.java.JavaPluginLoader.enablePlugin(JavaPluginLoader.java:370) ~[purpur-api-1.18-R0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar:?]
at org.bukkit.plugin.SimplePluginManager.enablePlugin(SimplePluginManager.java:500) ~[purpur-api-1.18-R0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar:?]
at org.bukkit.craftbukkit.v1_18_R1.CraftServer.enablePlugin(CraftServer.java:563) ~[purpur-1.18.jar:git-Purpur-"e65c2e3"]
at org.bukkit.craftbukkit.v1_18_R1.CraftServer.enablePlugins(CraftServer.java:477) ~[purpur-1.18.jar:git-Purpur-"e65c2e3"]
at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.loadWorld0(MinecraftServer.java:730) ~[purpur-1.18.jar:git-Purpur-"e65c2e3"]
at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.loadLevel(MinecraftServer.java:506) ~[purpur-1.18.jar:git-Purpur-"e65c2e3"]
at net.minecraft.server.dedicated.DedicatedServer.initServer(DedicatedServer.java:347) ~[purpur-1.18.jar:git-Purpur-"e65c2e3"]
at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.runServer(MinecraftServer.java:1215) ~[purpur-1.18.jar:git-Purpur-"e65c2e3"]
at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.lambda$spin$0(MinecraftServer.java:320) ~[purpur-1.18.jar:git-Purpur-"e65c2e3"]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:831) ~[?:?]

@HypixionGaming
Copy link
Author

Quote from AA dev "I will have to look into it tomorrow, on the surface I can't see why this is happening; AntiAura's classes and methods seem to be there and VeinMiner is accessing them. The API VeinMiner uses has not changed since 2016 really, as the new AAPI was introduced. (I do really need to sort out the API at some point, but point is nothing should have changed as far as I know). I will look into it more when I have time tomorrow (or maybe the day after)."

@2008Choco
Copy link
Owner

Thank you for also contacting the AA author. I will reinvestigate and take a look to see why this is causing issues. I don't see any VeinMiner users making use of AntiAura at all (at least through bStats, so that metric may be skewed), though perhaps this is why.

@2008Choco 2008Choco added bug A bug report good first issue An issue that would be very easy for a new contributor to try to resolve for their first labels Dec 11, 2021
@2008Choco 2008Choco changed the title The version of AntiAura on this server is incompatible with Veinminer. Please post information on the spigot resource discussion page. AntiAura incompatible with VeinMiner Dec 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug A bug report good first issue An issue that would be very easy for a new contributor to try to resolve for their first
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants