Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 23, 2017. It is now read-only.

Add disclaimer for free text aggregates #344

Closed
noahmanger opened this issue Jul 21, 2015 · 9 comments
Closed

Add disclaimer for free text aggregates #344

noahmanger opened this issue Jul 21, 2015 · 9 comments
Assignees

Comments

@noahmanger
Copy link
Contributor

For the aggregates on the Disbursements tab we need to add language that explains they are the result of aggregating free text fields, so stuff may not be included.

@jmcarp
Copy link
Contributor

jmcarp commented Jul 21, 2015

Likewise for Schedule A aggregates by employer and occupation.

@noahmanger
Copy link
Contributor Author

@emileighoutlaw can you weigh in on how this language looks?

Note: these totals are calculated based on data collected via free text input as reported by this committee in their filings. These totals do not take into account misspellings or variations.

It would show up here:
screen shot 2015-07-23 at 4 58 40 pm

@emileighoutlaw
Copy link
Contributor

Does this seem more clear to you?

"Note: These totals are calculated from filing data that the committee reported with free text input. As such, totals don't take into account misspellings or variations."

@PaulClark2
Copy link

I'm not crazy about calling a committee or treasurer out on their spelling. How about something like this:

"Note: The totals by purpose are summed based on free text input as reported by this committee. Variations in spelling or abbreviation will produce multiple totals for the same purpose of disbursement."

The note could go on to suggest to the user to scan the entire list to guarantee they are getting all the information they want.

@noahmanger
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh that's a good catch. I'd like to keep it more general so that the same language can be used for aggregating purpose / employer / occupation, etc. What about:

Note: These totals are summed based on free text input as reported by this committee. Variations in spelling or abbreviation will produce multiple totals for the same category. For the most accurate information, click here to view the list of itemized transactions. »

@PaulClark2
Copy link

@noahmanger I like that 👍

@emileighoutlaw
Copy link
Contributor

Me too!

@PaulClark2
Copy link

This is a little nit-picky but I'll suggest changing "For the most accurate information" to "For the most complete information" The aggregations aren't necessarily inaccurate but they may be incomplete because of the nature of the free text data entry.

@noahmanger
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants