Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 12, 2019. It is now read-only.

Part 478 has some inconsistent phrasing for "curio or relic" - "curio or museum piece" #406

Open
brittag opened this issue Feb 26, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@brittag
Copy link
Contributor

brittag commented Feb 26, 2016

Part 478 seems to have two different ways of referring to the same concept:

The definition of "curios or relics" includes "curios or relics of museum interest", which indicates to me that the regulation probably means the same thing when it says "relic" and "museum piece".

This is a little bit of a problem because if you search the regulation for "curio or relic", trying to find out all the relevant information about these types of items, you might not find the sections that say "curio or museum piece". It also means that the words "museum piece" don't get a definition link.

It may be helpful to map these terms to each other as equivalent terms, if that is legally accurate.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant