bpf: Fix a verifier bug due to incorrect branch offset comparison wit…

…h cpu=v4

Bpf cpu=v4 support is introduced in [1] and Commit 4cd58e9
("bpf: Support new 32bit offset jmp instruction") added support for new
32bit offset jmp instruction. Unfortunately, in function
bpf_adj_delta_to_off(), for new branch insn with 32bit offset, the offset
(plus/minor a small delta) compares to 16-bit offset bound
[S16_MIN, S16_MAX], which caused the following verification failure:
  $ ./test_progs-cpuv4 -t verif_scale_pyperf180
  ...
  insn 10 cannot be patched due to 16-bit range
  ...
  libbpf: failed to load object 'pyperf180.bpf.o'
  scale_test:FAIL:expect_success unexpected error: -12 (errno 12)
  torvalds#405     verif_scale_pyperf180:FAIL

Note that due to recent llvm18 development, the patch [2] (already applied
in bpf-next) needs to be applied to bpf tree for testing purpose.

The fix is rather simple. For 32bit offset branch insn, the adjusted
offset compares to [S32_MIN, S32_MAX] and then verification succeeded.

  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]
  [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]

Fixes: 4cd58e9 ("bpf: Support new 32bit offset jmp instruction")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]

kernel/bpf/core.c

@@ -371,14 +371,18 @@ static int bpf_adj_delta_to_imm(struct bpf_insn *insn, u32 pos, s32 end_old,
 static int bpf_adj_delta_to_off(struct bpf_insn *insn, u32 pos, s32 end_old,
 				s32 end_new, s32 curr, const bool probe_pass)
 {
-	const s32 off_min = S16_MIN, off_max = S16_MAX;
+	s64 off_min, off_max, off;
 	s32 delta = end_new - end_old;
-	s32 off;
 
-	if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JA))
+	if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JA)) {
 		off = insn->imm;
-	else
+		off_min = S32_MIN;
+		off_max = S32_MAX;
+	} else {
 		off = insn->off;
+		off_min = S16_MIN;
+		off_max = S16_MAX;
+	}
 
 	if (curr < pos && curr + off + 1 >= end_old)
 		off += delta;